If we speak, what will happen? If we do not speak, who will speak for us?

Protest in a small community.  image Nadia abu Shanab

In large cities, a Jewish person declares Palestinian rights to be equal to their own, and they are welcomed into new institutions of non-Zionist Jewish worship, politics and identity. They blend into large groups of protestors wearing the same T-shirts: Jews say no. Jews for ceasefire. They attend discussion groups to unpack their anti-Palestinian training. In a place as small as Aotearoa, a Jew who says ‘Palestinians are my equals’ has been warned that they will be alone and vilified. To doubt Zionism is to become a Hamas-lover race-traitor genocide-monger with (according to statements printed by a senior Stuff journalist without question) no Jewish identity.

That did not begin on October 7, 2023.

Before AJV was formed, its co-founders tried and failed for 18 months to obtain permission to convene a single conversation where Progressive synagogue members would be allowed to speak freely about Israel. Even in 2019, there was no Jewish space for one unpoliced conversation among synagogue members. Thus did Zionist boards drive the wedge between their questioning and dissenting members.

Since then, Jewish institutions have ruled out more and more of the world in the interests of Israel. Human rights – antisemitic. Ceasefire – genocidal. Their rightward lurch leaves no place for Jewish doubt about the reality of the Zionist fairy tale, the murder and starvation of civilians, and the nature of any Israel that emerges from this unfathomable violence.

Where does the doubt go in a small community?

Alternative Jewish Voices was formed as a Jewish-pluralist collective. We reject the Zionist claim to a monopoly over Jewish identity. We are drawn from the not-Zionist breadth. We are inspired by large, politically uniform Jewish organisations whose members can block the rotunda of Congress or the Brooklyn Bridge. However, our five founding members could have held our protests in the back of a taxi. Our challenge was to make our breadth strategic and fearlessly Jewish.

We have always told our Palestinian friends that together we are a Venn diagram. We each have communal issues and audience, while we coalesce around the work of justice in Palestine. We will never sound fully alike, but when we stand side by side we model the solution.

Nor do we sound quite like other solidarist organisations because, for us, Palestine is not a distant issue. It ripples back and forth through our daily lives.

There are some people for whom solidarity is straightforward: if X cannot stand beside you while you call for justice in Palestine then X was never truly your friend and you lose nothing by letting go of them. That does not work for Jews. That suggests that our families are not part of us, and it invalidates our oldest Jewish relationships. It suggests that we are better off cutting ourselves entirely adrift – but our relationships are more precious and organic than that.

Even worse, such a blanket demand mirrors the Zionist tactic: adhere unwaveringly or your family, community and your oldest friends will heal smoothly over your exclusion.

That is not a path; that is a threat and we will not replicate it. At a recent AJV meeting, one of the common threads was our difficult, essential work of preserving integral relationships. That work is harder now than it has ever been before.

Why do Jews feel compelled to speak when the first step is so hard? Ask instead: if we do not speak, who will speak for us? It is unthinkable that we will be mere spectators while this is done in our names. We could not bear for our generation to be remembered as having been passive at genocide. This crime is ours to end, and justice is partly ours to build. Even if we were born and raised on the myths of Zionism, the Israel that we see before us has forfeited any legitimacy as the centrepiece of our Jewish identity.

And look: the radicalisation of the Jewish-Christian Zionist camp in Aotearoa has driven the old wedge differently. Jewish institutions have cut themselves off from the Jews who question, and from the Jews who see a more embracing future than that of Benjamin Netanyahu and the endless American bombs of the IDF. The Zionist vision also makes it a litmus test that Aotearoa Jews must enjoy rights to Israel which take precedence over the rights of Palestinians. Who would want to pass that test?

Now that the moral cost of conforming blindly to Zionism is so high, Aotearoa’s broad not-Zionist tent has become the place of radical welcome.

Our breadth is our strength because the process of enquiring into one’s identity and forming a more just Jewishness is layered and reflective. There are decades of conditioning to be peeled back, and exploration to be undertaken of the diasporic Jewish identities which flourish in the space that opens up. In a broad tent questioning, discovery and growth can take place alongside the urgent, liberating action that is needed to stop the killing in Gaza, to bring about a ceasefire and then to press for the justice that must underlie any real solution.

Dayenu and Alternative Jewish Voices are merging so that we can extend this radical welcome to more of Aotearoa’s Jews.

Come and speak freely.

Marilyn Garson for

Dayenu and Alternative Jewish Voices

Press release: NZ Jewish and Palestinian groups gather at Parliament to urge new Minister to call for ceasefire in Gaza

Monday, 4 December – For immediate release


On Tuesday, 5 December at 12:45pm supporters of Palestine will gather at the steps of Parliament to call on the incoming Minister of Foreign Affairs, the new Government and all our elected representatives to take action and call for an immediate and permanent ceasefire. Rt Hon Winston Peters takes up the role as the new Minister of Foreign Affairs, as hostilities resume and innocent civilians in Gaza continue to be killed.

This is a time that calls for courageous and compassionate leadership. Ahead of the state opening of Parliament on Wednesday when the new government will speak to its policy agenda, Alternative Jewish Voices and Justice for Palestine have sent a briefing to the incoming Minister of Foreign Affairs on the actions the new government should take to address the immediate situation in Gaza and to play a role in establishing a new pathway to a just peace in Palestine and Israel.


In addition to calling for a permanent ceasefire, Alternative Jewish Voices and Justice for Palestine urge the Government to immediately:

● Call for all parties to act in accordance with their obligations under international law
● Demand the provision of sufficient humanitarian aid in Gaza, including the fuel necessary to
distribute supplies and restore hospital operations
● Call on Hamas to release all civilian hostages, and Israel to release
● Reject the provision of military aid to Israel
● Support the investigation and adjudication of all alleged war crimes.


“New Zealand must act now to support efforts to end the brutality in Gaza. But just as Israel’s disregard for Palestinian lives didn’t start on October 7, the need for the international community to stand up for Palestinian rights and to hold Israel to account for its breaches of international law will continue after the current violence ends. New Zealand has a role to play in establishing a pathway
to a just and lasting peace” said Justice for Palestine spokesperson, Samira Zaiton.

The human rights groups’ briefing urges the Government to take a principled stance, consistent with New Zealand’s long-standing independent approach to foreign policy, to support a peace process that addresses the root causes of the current situation.


Marilyn Garson, Alternative Jewish Voices Co-founder said: “Israel is carrying out the longest, now-illegal, now-apartheid occupation in modern history. In both Gaza and the West Bank, Palestinians have been subjected to daily infringements of their basic human rights including thousands of political prisoners being held without charge or trial. Millions of Palestinian refugees have never been able to return to their homes. There will be no lasting peace until our governments support a peace process that addresses these issues and respects Palestinians’ right to self-determination.”

Read the full briefing to the Minister here.

Contact: Samira Zaiton; Marilyn Garson


Justice for Palestine is a human rights organisation working to promote justice, peace and freedom for the Palestinian people. Justice for Palestine is a democratic, membership organisation that works to educate and inform New Zealanders about issues relating to Palestine and to advocate for New Zealand to contribute to international solidarity with Palestinian efforts to achieve equal rights.

Alternative Jewish Voices is a collective of Wellington and Auckland Jews. AJV works on three issues: Jewish pluralism in the community and its representation, anti-racism including antisemitism, and supporting Palestinians as they pursue their own liberation and freedom. AJV welcomes every step that normalises relations with Palestinian communities.

Who represents the Jewish community?

Through the weeks of Israel’s assault on Gaza, our media have solicited comments from the NZ Jewish Council (NZJC) and the Israel Institute (IINZ) without querying their composition or mandates. Publicly available information shows that the NZJC falls far short of representing the Jewish community, while the IINZ seems to be a Christian-libertarian company with one Jewish director.

The NZJC’s constitution claims that it is the representative body of NZ Jews. We could write the same words with as little meaning. This claim is based on the assumption that Jews affiliated with a Jewish synagogue or institution are represented by the structure that underpins the NZ Jewish Council. Jews with no institutional membership are entirely excluded. In fact, we don’t know how many or who or where they are.

The NZJC constitution and the Charities Commission / Incorporated Societies websites show that the Jewish Council structure is hollow. As sometimes happens in small communities, it seems to have become a collection of the willing. In this case, the willing are uniformly ardent Zionists who speak their views in the name of the whole community, while ruling other Jews in or out for their stance on Zionism. They have made Israel, not religion or Jewish inheritance, into a litmus test.

New Zealand’s Jewish communities were intended to be represented by Regional Jewish Councils. Are we really?

The Auckland Regional Jewish Council appears to be the only regional council in formal operation. They are obliged to inform the Charities Commission of any change in their officers, but the Charities Commission’s website shows no change to the Auckland Regional Jewish Council officers since 2006. Its six officers are the same individuals who signed the constitution itself.

(If the date rings a bell, that might be because 2006 was also the year of Hamas’s election. We have loudly objected to calling Hamas a representative of all Gaza on the strength of that expired mandate.)

The Wellington Regional Jewish Council (WRJC) is listed on the NZJC website and in the Wellington Jewish Community Centre directory, but no information is attached to the listing. It is not formally listed as a charity or incorporated society. 

More than two years ago, the WRJC convened a public meeting whose participants “made clear their dissatisfaction with the Jewish Council’s tone of voice, composition, accountability and their narrow definition of the Jewish community’s shared interests.” The WRJC issued a public statement suspending its own operations until it can produce “a new constitution that can capture the voice and aspirations of the community.” To date, they have not done that. If the WRJC is operating in some informal sense, they have not consulted or accounted to the community.

The other regional councils may be informally composed but they are not officially registered.

The Jewish community of New Zealand is not represented by any accountable regional structure.

The national NZ Jewish Council can have up to 18 members, geographically divided to cover the entire country. Voting members of the Council are appointed from the Regional Councils while non-voting members come from a list of affiliate organisations and synagogues. A number of the affiliate groups are not membership organisations that might offer real channels for community input, and none are non-Zionist. The full council chooses the NZJC Executive Committee and the Executive Committee chooses the President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer.  The Executive Committee may also establish sub-committees with people who are not on the Council.

Without a democratic regional structure that represents Jewish commmunities, we do not choose and cannot influence or recall those who purport to represent us. They do not account to us. Indeed, it’s not clear that they account to anyone. Longstanding members of Auckland and Wellington synagogues are not aware of any opportunity to attend AGMs (which need be comprised only of member organisations) or express their views. There is no public voting mechanism.

That is far from being a representative community structure.

The constitution of the NZJC does not contain the words ‘Israel’ or ‘Zionism’. Yet the NZJC’s devotion to Zionism and its vilification of any non-Zionist Jewish identity are its hallmark. The NZJC is effectively trying to define who is a Jew, a task for which they have no qualification or mandate whatsoever. The Dunedin Jewish community has publicly placed itself in solidarity with Palestinians. The NZJC’s statements would exclude the whole community.

Lacking any democratic accountability or intent to represent the breadth of the community, the NZJC cannot claim to be our representative body. In the absence of representation, we call once more on our synagogues and community institutions to find their voices and speak with empathy and vision.

Our media have also turned for comment to the Israel Institute (IINZ). The Jewish Council circulates IINZ materials as ‘helpful explainers’ of Israel’s war on Gaza.

The two institutions are related through David Cumin. Shortly after her comments at the Christchurch anti-terror hui provoked a walkout by participants, Jewish Council spokesperson Juliet Moses appeared on David Cumin’s podcast to announce their intention to “disempower … as much as possible” the Jews who “raise their voice” in pluralism. 

The directors of the IINZ (only one of whom is Jewish) are also founding or executive members of the Free Speech and Taxpayers’ lobby groups, and other Christian Zionist organisations whose names might imply a Jewish provenance. The IINZ is not a Jewish institution although it does reflect Israel’s increasing Christian Zionist support. Media should make that clear when giving David Cumin airtime.

So, who speaks for the Jewish community? It is prejudicial and inaccurate for our whole community to be understood through these harsh, pro-war voices. Scores of NZ Jews have signed an open letter calling on our institutions to find their voice, their empathy and vision. They have yet even to distance themselves from Brian Tamaki’s Destiny Church and others who support Israel’s war in the service of very different agendas.

We are alarmed by the perception that the whole Jewish community is rightwing and opposed to our equal human rights. We call on the media to include speakers who represent Jewish diversity, and we call on our Jewish institutions to speak up.

Alternative Jewish Voices of Aotearoa